Doesn't all this mean that...

[bizzatch]

Sherman was correct ? I haven't posted in awhile, and i'm sorry if I missed anything, but, Sherman said we were within double digits of hearing something from the band. Well, i'd say Mike Anthonty claiming that a new VH album is on the way in the year 2001 is a pretty good sign.

Maybe i'm wrong..I don't know..i'm pretty happy anyway, i'm sure it's DLR, and even more happily, with the Eddie video, he looks healthy, and we have word from Mike that Van Halen will have their name on some new material within a year, that's all I care about.

[George M]

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by bizzatch:
Sherman was correct ? I haven't posted in awhile, and i'm sorry if I missed anything, but, Sherman said we were within double digits of hearing something from the band. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I think this is a valid point. I didn't follow the entire Sherman thing very carefully, but it sounds to me like some people probably owe him an apology. I for one never drove people off unless I had proof that they were NOT telling the truth. Also, "Michael Jackson" is looking pretty authentic now, too.

As I've said, I consider this the first real "announcement" that we've been waiting for. If you care to read about that issue, here is the topic I posted it in: http://www.vhforums.com/vhlforum/For...ML/005161.html