Follow us on...
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Watch us on YouTube
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Atomic Punk bklynboy68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Favorite VH Album

    The Magnificent 7
    Last Online

    10.27.16 @ 06:29 PM
    Liked 6,056 Times in 3,292 Posts

    Premium Member

    Default Will California Court Impose China-Style Forced Abortion on Surrogate Mother?

    A new California lawsuit is revealing the sordid realities and ethical nightmares that lie behind so-called surrogate motherhood — the practice, legal in 22 states, in which women are allowed to sell their own or other women’s biological children in exchange for cash payments in the tens of thousands of dollars.

    As revealed recently by People Magazine and the New York Post, a Georgia sperm donor known in court papers only as “C.M.” is attempting to force a California woman to abort one of three triplets she is carrying because he paid for only one of them.

    The plaintiff is asking the court for the State of California to initiate the same kind of forced abortion practiced in China to almost universal condemnation.

    According to the articles, “C.M.” paid a 47-year-old mother of four, Melissa Cook, $33,000 to bear for him a child conceived from his sperm and eggs donated by a 20-year-old woman.

    In the past, so-called “surrogate motherhood” involved women selling their own biological children for money.

    The women would conceive through artificial insemination, for a fee, and then turn their biological children over to whomever had paid for them — often to a male and female couple who could not conceive a child but increasingly, in recent years, to gay men who also want to raise children.

    However, technology has advanced to the point that doctors can now implant eggs and sperm in a true surrogate mother — a third woman who is not genetically connected to the child but who carries it in her womb until birth.

    One of the dirty secrets of IVF generally and of surrogate motherhood in particular is that doctors often create more embryos than can be safely carried to term. The doctors often destroy in the womb the “extra” embryos, weeding them out like carrots in a garden.

    This is what happened in Cook’s case.

    She ended up carrying triplets and the Georgia man who paid her — a 49-year-old postal worker who lives with his parents — wants only one of the children.

    He wants the court to force Cook, who is now 23 weeks pregnant, to kill one of the unborn children through abortion. He apparently plans on giving up the second child through adoption.

    However, Cook says that she wanted to seek custody of the third “extra” child, not kill it through abortion as “C.M.” wanted.

    According to People, the Georgia postal worker’s attorney wrote to the pregant woman, Cook, and said that “her refusal to undergo an abortion would make her liable ‘for large money damages.’”

    This is the world that America’s callous abortion regime and legal culture has created. Children are simply commodities that can be bought and sold on the open market — and killed at will in utero.

    “I have a deep empathy for men who want children,” Cook said in a statement released to People. “However, I now think that the basic concept of surrogacy arrangements must be re-examined, scrutinized and reconsidered.”

    The New York Post, which claims to have broken the story about Cook, is campaigning against the sordid practices behind surrogate motherhood.

    “It amounts to a human breeding industry, where women are paid anywhere from $25,000 to $50,000 to give birth to other people’s children — not to mention the exorbitant fees for lawyers and ‘placement’ agencies,” wrote Jennifer Lahl in the “Post” right before Christmas.

    Lahl added that, as in Cook’s case, “U.S. contract law is being used to try to forcibly terminate healthy babies.”

    She also pointed out that the European Parliament, which has long been skeptical of baby selling through surrogacy, in late December condemned the practice, calling it an exploitation of mostly poor, vulnerable women.

    Lahl is particularly angry over the silence of even prolife Republicans on the issue, particularly the current crop of Republican presidential candidates.

    “Women across America have been bullied, intimidated, exploited, and used by the commercial surrogacy industry that preys on the poor for profit,” said Lahl, a former pediatric nurse and President of the Center for Bioethics and Culture Network, in a statement issued January 5.

    “Now that industry has gone too far by trying to force women to abort healthy babies solely for financial benefit,” she added. “Through this case and others, Americans are quickly coming to understand why Canada and so many European, Asian, and African countries have banned paid surrogacy. It turns women into faceless breeders and children into made-to-order products. This must stop here.”

     "He has a swaggering retro machismo that will give hives to the Steinem cabal" -Camille Paglia on Donald Trump

    "Make way for the bad guy"- Tony Montana

    'This hamburger don't need no helper"- David Lee Roth

    "I wish Bon Jovi would've given me a call before he recorded all of his hits, because the lyrics would've been smarter, the melodies would've been much more smashing, and they would've sold a lot fewer records." -David Lee Roth

    "My beef is people thinking Bon Jovi is good cuz they sold lots of records to housewives." -tango

    "But being number one doesn’t really mean jack fuck all. We sold twice as many records as other records that year (1984) that landed in the Number One position." ~Eddie Van Halen

  2. #2
    Gird your loins Daisy Hill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Goose Poop, Ohio
    Favorite VH Album

    Fair Warning
    Favorite VH Song

    Last Online

    10.27.16 @ 06:24 PM
    Liked 1,563 Times in 895 Posts

    Premium Member


    surrogacy is still a poorly regulated practice.

    Recently comedian Sherry Shepard, who had talked quite a bit on The View about her desire to have more children with her new husband tried to back out of a surrogacy agreement when her marriage suddenly imploded.

    She tried to have a court order that she was not responsible for the child because it was not biologically hers, but the child of her ex husband and an egg donor. The surrogate by law would have been declared the child's mother on the birth certificate and would have been left legally and financially responsible for the child (even tho it wasn't biologically hers either)

    thankfully the court ordered that Shepard IS the mother due to the legal forms she signed and awarded the ex husband child support ( which was the whole issue for Shepard). The ex husband is now raising the child alone

    What a way to be brought into the world



Similar Threads

  1. Mother-of-eight who lives off £2,000-a-month benefits says she will use a surrogate t
    By rocknblues81 in forum VH Fans Meeting Place (Non-Music)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08.20.14, 10:49 PM
    By bklynboy68 in forum VH Fans Meeting Place (Non-Music)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01.06.14, 05:51 AM
  3. Children's suit against "bad mother" thrown out of court
    By Daisy Hill in forum VH Fans Meeting Place (Non-Music)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08.31.11, 03:58 PM
  4. California Supreme Court: Websites Not Libel In 3rd Party Posting
    By Axxman300 in forum VH Fans Meeting Place (Non-Music)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11.20.06, 01:50 PM
  5. Court says California oral sex law violates rights
    By lal5150 in forum VH Fans Meeting Place (Non-Music)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03.07.06, 10:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts