Follow us on...
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Watch us on YouTube
Register
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Atomic Punk
    Join Date
    01.29.02
    Age
    49
    Location
    somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    22,946
    Last Online

    12.17.17 @ 06:57 PM
    Likes
    845
    Liked 1,229 Times in 448 Posts

    Default Another small win for the Fourth Amendment, thanks to the US Supreme Court.

    Another small win for the Fourth Amendment, thanks to the US Supreme Court. With its ruling in the Rodriguez v. US case, law enforcement officers will have to work just a little bit harder to perform unconstitutional searches during traffic stops.

    "A seizure for a traffic violation justifies a police investigation of that violation” – not more — and “authority for the seizure . . . ends when tasks tied to the traffic infraction are – or reasonably should have been—completed…" Traffic stops have to be reasonably short, and unless there is reasonable suspicion of some other crime, officers can’t use the stop as a subterfuge for extraneous investigation. Most specifically, says Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s opinion for the Court, officers can’t prolong a traffic stop just to perform a dog-sniffing drug search.

    The unanswered question is how long can a traffic stop last before it becomes "prolonged?" The bright line would appear to be that it becomes prolonged if extended past the point a citizen should feel free to go. For instance, if someone's pulled over for speeding, the instant the officer issues a ticket or warning, the stop is over. Any searches performed past that point (including deploying drug-sniffing dogs) would be a violation of the Fourth Amendment if there's no probable cause.

    https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20...ls-it-is.shtml
    "Watch what people are cynical about, and one can often discover what they lack.” -- Gen. George S. Patton

  2. #2
    Atomic Punk lovemachine97(Version 2)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    06.05.03
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    13,995
    Last Online

    12.17.17 @ 05:26 PM
    Likes
    817
    Liked 3,119 Times in 1,829 Posts


    Premium Member

    Default

    This is especially important because of what SCOTUS has ruled about drug sniffing dogs previously.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Canadian Supreme Court Rules that Canadians have the right to die
    By Daisy Hill in forum Political Underground
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02.11.15, 10:06 PM
  2. Supreme Court Upholds Prayer at Government Meetings
    By bklynboy68 in forum VH Fans Meeting Place (Non-Music)
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 05.09.14, 05:28 PM
  3. Supreme Court rules against affirmative action
    By Jesus H Christ in forum VH Fans Meeting Place (Non-Music)
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 04.28.14, 03:52 PM
  4. Here we go.... Supreme Court considering to ban handguns...
    By voivod in forum VH Fans Meeting Place (Non-Music)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10.01.09, 01:09 PM
  5. Supreme Court OKs Random Drug Tests in Schools
    By Pasadena Murdock in forum VH Fans Meeting Place (Non-Music)
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06.29.02, 12:30 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •