Follow us on...
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Watch us on YouTube
Register
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Atomic Punk
    Join Date
    01.29.02
    Age
    49
    Location
    somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    22,946
    Last Online

    12.11.17 @ 04:37 PM
    Likes
    842
    Liked 1,229 Times in 448 Posts

    Default Maine to consider cell phone cancer warning

    AUGUSTA, Maine A Maine legislator wants to make the state the first to require cell phones to carry warnings that they can cause brain cancer, although there is no consensus among scientists that they do and industry leaders dispute the claim.

    The now-ubiquitous devices carry such warnings in some countries, though no U.S. states require them, according to the National Conference of State Legislators. A similar effort is afoot in San Francisco, where Mayor Gavin Newsom wants his city to be the nation's first to require the warnings.

    Maine Rep. Andrea Boland, D-Sanford, said numerous studies point to the cancer risk, and she has persuaded legislative leaders to allow her proposal to come up for discussion during the 2010 session that begins in January, a session usually reserved for emergency and governors' bills.

    Boland herself uses a cell phone, but with a speaker to keep the phone away from her head. She also leaves the phone off unless she's expecting a call. At issue is radiation emitted by all cell phones.

    Under Boland's bill, manufacturers would have to put labels on phones and packaging warning of the potential for brain cancer associated with electromagnetic radiation. The warnings would recommend that users, especially children and pregnant women, keep the devices away from their head and body.

    The Federal Communications Commission, which maintains that all cell phones sold in the U.S. are safe, has set a standard for the "specific absorption rate" of radiofrequency energy, but it doesn't require handset makers to divulge radiation levels.

    The San Francisco proposal would require the display of the absorption rate level next to each phone in print at least as big as the price. Boland's bill is not specific about absorption rate levels, but would require a permanent, nonremovable advisory of risk in black type, except for the word "warning," which would be large and in red letters. It would also include a color graphic of a child's brain next to the warning.

    While there's little agreement about the health hazards, Boland said Maine's roughly 950,000 cell phone users among its 1.3 million residents "do not know what the risks are."

    All told, more than 270 million people subscribed to cellular telephone service last year in the United States, an increase from 110 million in 2000, according to CTIA-The Wireless Association. The industry group contends the devices are safe.

    "With respect to the matter of health effects associated with wireless base stations and the use of wireless devices, CTIA and the wireless industry have always been guided by science, and the views of impartial health organizations. The peer-reviewed scientific evidence has overwhelmingly indicated that wireless devices do not pose a public health risk," said CTIA's John Walls.

    James Keller of Lewiston, whose cell phone serves as his only phone, seemed skeptical about warning labels. He said many things may cause cancer but lack scientific evidence to support that belief. Besides, he said, people can't live without cell phones.

    "It seems a little silly to me, but it's not going to hurt anyone to have a warning on there. If they're really concerned about it, go ahead and put a warning on it," he said outside a sporting good store in Topsham. "It wouldn't deter me from buying a phone."

    While there's been no long-term studies on cell phones and cancer, some scientists suggest erring on the side of caution.

    Last year, Dr. Ronald B. Herberman, director emeritus of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, sent a memo to about 3,000 faculty and staff members warning of risks based on early, unpublished data. He said that children should use the phones only for emergencies because their brains were still developing and that adults should keep the phone away from the head and use a speakerphone or a wireless headset.

    Herberman, who says scientific conclusions often take too long, is one of numerous doctors and researchers who have endorsed an August report by retired electronics engineer L. Lloyd Morgan. The report highlights a study that found significantly increased risk of brain tumors from 10 or more years of cell phone or cordless phone use.

    Also, the BioInitiative Working Group, an international group of scientists, notes that many countries have issued warnings and that the European Parliament has passed a resolution calling for governmental action to address concerns over health risks from mobile phone use.

    But the National Cancer Institute said studies thus far have turned up mixed and inconsistent results, noting that cell phones did not come into widespread use in the United States until the 1990s.

    "Although research has not consistently demonstrated a link between cellular telephone use and cancer, scientists still caution that further surveillance is needed before conclusions can be drawn," according to the Cancer Institute's Web site.

    Motorola Inc., one of the nation's major wireless phone makers, says on its Web site that all of its products comply with international safety guidelines for radiofrequency energy exposure.

    A Motorola official referred questions to CTIA.
    "Watch what people are cynical about, and one can often discover what they lack. -- Gen. George S. Patton

  2. #2
    carpe damn diem billy007's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.19.00
    Age
    54
    Location
    On the wild card line...
    Posts
    28,683
    Favorite VH Song

    "Dance The Night Away"
    Last Online

    12.16.17 @ 02:36 PM
    Likes
    1,046
    Liked 1,350 Times in 926 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by voivod View Post
    James Keller of Lewiston, whose cell phone serves as his only phone, seemed skeptical about warning labels. He said many things may cause cancer but lack scientific evidence to support that belief. Besides, he said, people can't live without cell phones.
    Oh, but we used to do just fine without 'em. Some of you might not remember that, but we did. Wasn't that long ago, either.

  3. #3
    Atomic Punk Little Dreamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.25.99
    Age
    45
    Location
    Pasadena, CA, USA
    Posts
    8,944
    Favorite VH Album

    Fair Warning
    Favorite VH Song

    Hear About It Later
    Last Online

    12.15.17 @ 11:35 PM
    Likes
    1,014
    Liked 1,390 Times in 763 Posts

    Default

    True.
    Brain cancer is not a fun thing, just ask Ted Kennedy. If the link is true, millions, let me take that back, hundreds of millions will die. True it's the new fad and there are huge commercial interests at stake. But think about it. Cancer. In your head.
    Little Dreamer

  4. #4
    Sinner's Swing!
    Join Date
    10.19.03
    Location
    Lees Summit, MO
    Posts
    3,472
    Last Online

    10.27.17 @ 06:31 PM
    Likes
    2
    Liked 22 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    People say I'm crazy about this. But honestly, it's the main reason I still don't own one, and I don't consider myself a "conspiracy" type person at all, I'm educated and have a doctorate. So don't think it's just a bunch of wackos that think in 20 years, it's possible that millions could die from this. I do think Nokia, AT&T, etc. stand to lose a TON of money if the science turned out to not be in their favor, and they certainly have the capability to push government agencies in their favor. I think if more people knew/understood the science behind these things, you wouldn't see nearly as many of them around.

    Using headsets I do believe helps, but personally, if those same waves can cook a potato when at a different frequency, I don't need it on my person all the time so I can "Tweet" or whatever.

  5. #5
    Sinner's Swing!
    Join Date
    10.19.03
    Location
    Lees Summit, MO
    Posts
    3,472
    Last Online

    10.27.17 @ 06:31 PM
    Likes
    2
    Liked 22 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    This is the article referred to in the OP:

    http://www.radiationresearch.org/pdfs/reasons_us.pdf

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Mobile Phone Tracker (cell phone)...
    By muffdiver in forum VH Fans Meeting Place (Non-Music)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04.02.07, 03:04 PM
  2. Who is your cell phone provider?
    By Bluetooth in forum VH Fans Meeting Place (Non-Music)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10.04.06, 08:38 PM
  3. Looking For VH Cell Phone Wallpaper!!!
    By EAS in forum Main VH Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09.10.05, 10:04 AM
  4. VH Cell phone
    By EVHWolf in forum Main VH Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02.20.05, 06:29 PM
  5. Cell Phone Service
    By Vince G. in forum VH Fans Meeting Place (Non-Music)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01.03.03, 10:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •